New Jersey v. Linarducci
8 A.2d 576, 123 N.J.L. 228, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 365
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Case, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Hague, JJ. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New Jersey v. Linarducci, 8 A.2d 576, 123 N.J.L. 228, 1939 N.J. LEXIS 365 (N.J. 1939).
8 A.2d 576 (New Jersey v. Linarducci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ORANGE SENIOR CITIZENS RESIDENCE, LLC VS. PAULETTE DAVIS (LT-32251-16, ESSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2018
State v. Milligan
495 A.2d 132 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
State v. Donley
204 A.2d 149 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1964)
State v. Oliver
117 A.2d 404 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)