New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Riordan
135 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 498, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 297
This text of 135 A. 919 (New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Riordan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
New Jersey Suburban Water Co. v. Riordan, 135 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 498, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 297 (N.J. 1926).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 10.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 A. 919, 103 N.J.L. 498, 1926 N.J. LEXIS 297, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-suburban-water-co-v-riordan-nj-1926.