New Jersey State Department of Health v. Hauser

Supreme Court of New Jersey

New Jersey State Department of Health v. Hauser

157 A. 439, 9 N.J. Misc. 1202, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67

DecidedNovember 23, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 157 A. 439 (New Jersey State Department of Health v. Hauser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Jersey State Department of Health v. Hauser, 157 A. 439, 9 N.J. Misc. 1202, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67 (N.J. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The writ in this case was allowed at the instance of the attorney-general. State v. Zabriskie, 43 N. J. L. 396.

The state department of health on the complaint of George Taylor brought proceedings against Charles A. Hauser to recover the penalty provided for a violation of the Shell Eish act of 1912, as amended. Hauser was convicted before the justice of the peace and appealed to the Common Pleas. The state sought to have the appeal dismissed on the ground that notice had not been served, as required by law, upon the prosecutor Taylor. The Common Pleas denied this motion.

There is nothing returned with the record to show what transpired, so we have no way of determining whether the notice of appeal was or was not served in accordance with the provisions of the statute.

The writ will, therefore, be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The writ in this case was allowed at the instance of the attorney-general. State v. Zabriskie, 43 N. J. L. 396.

The state department of health on the complaint of George Taylor brought proceedings against Charles A. Hauser to recover the penalty provided for a violation of the Shell Eish act of 1912, as amended. Hauser was convicted before the justice of the peace and appealed to the Common Pleas. The state sought to have the appeal dismissed on the ground that notice had not been served, as required by law, upon the prosecutor Taylor. The Common Pleas denied this motion.

There is nothing returned with the record to show what transpired, so we have no way of determining whether the notice of appeal was or was not served in accordance with the provisions of the statute.

The writ will, therefore, be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

157 A. 439, 9 N.J. Misc. 1202, 1931 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-state-department-of-health-v-hauser-nj-1931.