New Jersey Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Parent Compton
This text of 58 A. 110 (New Jersey Society for Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. Parent Compton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This certiorari brings up for review the judgment of a justice of the peace in Atlantic City against the prosecutor for cruelty to a dog.
The act of 1880 (Pamph. L., p. 218, § 13) entitled “An act for the prevention of cruelty to animals” gives jurisdiction to any justice of the peace, district Court or police magistrate of the county or city.
The act of 1898 (Pamph. L., p. 556), which is a revision of the District Court act, provides, by section 30, that every suit to recover a penalty not exceeding $300 shall be cognizable in a District Court of this state.
Section 31 provides that no justice of the peace, or court of small causes, shall have jurisdiction over any cause or' proceedings cognizable before a District Court where the [87]*87defendant resides within the limits of any city where a District Court is established.
The state constitution provides that the legislature may alter or abolish inferior courts (of which the court held by a justice of the peace is one) as public good shall require.
The power of the legislature to deprive a justice of the peace of the jurisdiction conferred upon him by the act of 1880 is unquestionable.
The judgment below must be set aside.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 A. 110, 71 N.J.L. 86, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-society-for-prevention-of-cruelty-to-animals-v-parent-compton-nj-1904.