New Jersey Poultry Producers' Ass'n v. Tradelius

126 A. 538, 96 N.J. Eq. 683, 11 Stock. 683, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 409

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The facts in this case, which arc voluminous, are quite fully and accurately set out in the conclusion filed by the learned vice-chancellor, who heard the case. Our examination of the record and a consideration of the facts lead us to the same conclusion as that of the vice-chancellor, viz., the complainant’s bill of complaint should be dismissed. The decree of the court of chancery is therefore affirmed and the bill of complaint dismissed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Tgbnchard, Parker, Minturn, Kaltsch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White Gardner, Yah Buskiric, Clark, McGlemnon, Kays—15.

For reversal—None.