New Jersey Patent Co. v. Walker
This text of 169 F. 1023 (New Jersey Patent Co. v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As it seems to me, the new affidavits offered by the complainants do not satisfactorily establish the charge that the defendant has bought or threatens to buy phonographs or records from any licensed dealer, and the situation presented upon this second motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore the same as when the original motion was denied. The preliminary injunction now asked for is refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-patent-co-v-walker-circtedpa-1909.