New Jersey Patent Co. v. Walker

169 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5504
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 17, 1909
DocketNo. 255
StatusPublished

This text of 169 F. 1023 (New Jersey Patent Co. v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Jersey Patent Co. v. Walker, 169 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5504 (circtedpa 1909).

Opinion

McPHERSON, District Judge.

As it seems to me, the new affidavits offered by the complainants do not satisfactorily establish the charge that the defendant has bought or threatens to buy phonographs or records from any licensed dealer, and the situation presented upon this second motion for a preliminary injunction is therefore the same as when the original motion was denied. The preliminary injunction now asked for is refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F. 1023, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-patent-co-v-walker-circtedpa-1909.