New Jersey Imperial Road Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County
This text of 81 A. 725 (New Jersey Imperial Road Co. v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of Gloucester County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error seeks to bring under review an order made by the Supreme Court refusing defendant’s application for a ciiange of venue. It is contended that the action is local in its nature, and that the change of venue asked for by the defendant was a matter of right. We are not called upon to pass upon this question, because it is manifest from the state of the case that the action has not been brought to trial, and that no final judgment has been rendered therein. In Defiance Fruit Co. v. Fox, 47 Vroom 482, the cause had proceeded to final judgment. Our review by writ of error is confined to final judgment. Gen. Stat., p. 1391, § 1; Chambers v. Philadelphia Pickling Co., 52 Vroom, 388; State v. Kelsey, post p. 542.
The writ of error should be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 A. 725, 82 N.J.L. 535, 53 Vroom 535, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 254, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-imperial-road-co-v-board-of-chosen-freeholders-of-gloucester-nj-1911.