New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. Torres

447 A.2d 1343, 185 N.J. Super. 182
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMarch 25, 1982
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 447 A.2d 1343 (New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. Torres, 447 A.2d 1343, 185 N.J. Super. 182 (N.J. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

185 N.J. Super. 182 (1982)
447 A.2d 1343

NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-APPELLANT,
v.
DIEGO TORRES AND ELIZABETH FEDERICI-TORRES, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND RICHARD AND ELIZABETH FEDERICI, PLAINTIFFS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF EVELYN MARIE TORRES, A MINOR.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted March 16, 1982.
Decided March 25, 1982.

Before Judges MICHELS, McELROY and J.H. COLEMAN.

Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney for appellants (James H. Walzer, Designated Counsel, of counsel and on the letter brief).

Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney for appellant, Elizabeth Torres (Randolph A. Newman, Designated Counsel, on the brief).

Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney for Evelyn Torres, a minor (James H. Klein, Law Guardian, on the letter brief).

Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent, cross-appellant (James R. Zazzali, former Attorney General; Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; John J. Chernoski, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The order dated October 21, 1980 which (1) terminated the parental rights of appellants, (2) committed Evelyn Marie Torres *183 to the guardianship, care and control of the New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Service, and (3) granted physical custody of the said child to her maternal grandparents, Richard and Elizabeth Federici until further proceedings, is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Page in his well-written opinion dated October 2, 1980. Also, see In the Matter of C.W., M.W. and N.F., 183 N.J. Super. 47 (App.Div. 1982).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Div. of Youth & Family v. Bgs
677 A.2d 1170 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1996)
Zirger v. General Accident Insurance
676 A.2d 1065 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
In re A.
649 A.2d 1310 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1994)
State ex rel. L.L.
625 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
State in Interest of LL
625 A.2d 559 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Matter of Guardianship of ROMC
581 A.2d 113 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1990)
New Jersey Division Youth & Family Services v. E.D.
558 A.2d 1377 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Nj Div. Youth & Fam. Serv. v. Ed
558 A.2d 1377 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
Thompson v. Vanaman
509 A.2d 304 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
L. v. G.
497 A.2d 215 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 A.2d 1343, 185 N.J. Super. 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-jersey-division-of-youth-and-family-services-v-torres-njsuperctappdiv-1982.