New Hermes Inc. v. Old Hermes Inc.
This text of 199 A.D.2d 44 (New Hermes Inc. v. Old Hermes Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (David B. Saxe, J.), entered June 26, 1992, which, inter alia, denied the defendant’s motion for interest on a prior award of attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs; and order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about May 7, 1993, which, inter alia, denied renewal or reargument, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Supreme Court properly denied the defendant landlord’s motion seeking prejudgment interest on its award of attorneys’ fees. Since there was no default by the tenant under the lease and no breach of contract, CPLR 5001 (a) is inapplicable to this action. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 A.D.2d 44, 605 N.Y.S.2d 858, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-hermes-inc-v-old-hermes-inc-nyappdiv-1993.