New Heaven Properties Ltd. v. Grinberg

302 A.D.2d 331, 754 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1792
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 27, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered February 7, 2002, which denied appellants’ motion to vacate a judgment awarding plaintiff $2,155,057.50, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Appellants failed to set forth grounds for vacatur of the judgment, which was based on a grant of summary judgment affirmed by this Court (293 AD2d 386 [2002]). The evidence, assuming, arguendo, it was newly discovered, related only to credibility and did not refute the essential findings underlying the judgment regarding appellants’ claimed right to an offset, [332] and thus would not have “probably” resulted in a different outcome (see Olwine, Connelly, Chase & Weyher v Valsan, Inc., 226 AD2d 102, 103 [1996]). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Lerner and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Heaven Properties Ltd. v. Grinberg, 302 A.D.2d 331, 754 N.Y.S.2d 877, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1792 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

302 A.D.2d 331 (New Heaven Properties Ltd. v. Grinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tribeca Lending Corp. v. Bartlett
103 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)