New Haven Savings Bank v. Tater

8 Conn. Supp. 42, 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 27
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in New Haven Savings Bank v. Tater. Read the opinion of the Court — 8 Conn. Super. Ct. 42
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided February 13, 1940·No. File No. 57793·Published

Opinion

SIMPSON, J.

While a receiver of rents may properly be sued, and while the court will not pass upon the merits of a cause of action in passing upon a petition for permission to sue the receiver, it should appear, at least prima facie, that the petitioner has a cause of action against the receiver. Moeller vs. Goffin, 1 Conn. Sup. 83; 53 C. J. Receivers §552.

In the petition it is alleged that the petitioner was upon the premises as an invitee and suffered injuries caused by the defective and dangerous condition of the premises, but it does not appear that he was an invitee upon that portion of the premises which was exclusively under the control of a tenant or the owner, or that the dangerous and defective condition was on any portion of the premises of which the receiver had control.

The petition is denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Haven Savings Bank v. Tater, 8 Conn. Supp. 42, 1940 Conn. Super. LEXIS 27 (Colo. Ct. App. 1940).

8 Conn. Supp. 42 (New Haven Savings Bank v. Tater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campo v. State Department of Health
1 Conn. Super. Ct. 83 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1935)