New Hampshire Ins. Group v. Frost
This text of 1996 Ohio 328 (New Hampshire Ins. Group v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 1218.]
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE GROUP, APPELLEE, v. FROST ET AL., APPELLEES; STUMP, APPELLANT. [Cite as New Hampshire Ins. Group v. Frost, 1996-Ohio-328.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 95-1653—Submitted October 9, 1996—Decided December 11, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 67823. __________________ Quandt, Giffels & Buck Co., L.P.A., Walter R. Matchinga and Edward J. Stoll, Jr., for appellee New Hampshire Insurance Group. McIntyre, Kahn & Kruse Co., L.P.A., Patrick J. Gallagher and Mark F. Kruse, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and STRATTON, JJ., concur. RESNICK and COOK, JJ., separately dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals. COOK, J., dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1996 Ohio 328, 77 Ohio St. 3d 1218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-hampshire-ins-group-v-frost-ohio-1996.