New Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Metropolitan Credit Consultants, Inc.

168 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 968, 2005 WL 1514458
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 28, 2005·No. No. ED-85057·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Metropolitan Credit Consultants, Inc., and James L. and Sandra Miller (collectively “the Millers”) appeal the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying their motion to set aside a $274,519.63 judgment in favor of New Freedom Mortgage Corporation (“New Freedom”).

After reviewing the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Millers’ motion to set aside the judgment. Tinsley v. B & B Engines, Inc., 27 S.W.3d 859, 861 (Mo.App. E.D. 2000); Preferred Laser Services, Inc. v. Abate, 117 S.W.3d 678, 680 (Mo.App. E.D. 2003). An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the award pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Metropolitan Credit Consultants, Inc., 168 S.W.3d 77, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 968, 2005 WL 1514458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

168 S.W.3d 77 (New Freedom Mortgage Corp. v. Metropolitan Credit Consultants, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preferred Laser Services, Inc. v. Abate
117 S.W.3d 678 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)
Tinsley v. B & B ENGINES, INC.
27 S.W.3d 859 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2000)