New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

359 A.2d 711, 116 R.I. 943, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1506
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided June 24, 1976·No. M. P. No. 75-195·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Cause before this court on petitioner’s motion for a suspension of the Commission’s order dated June 27, 1975, and respondents’ objection thereto. After due consideration, court decided to assign the case to the Calendar for Thursday, July 1, 1976 at 9:30 a. m. for oral argument. That argument will be confined narrowly to the following five issues: (1) the erosion adjust[944]*944ment; (2) the cost of equity; (3) purchases from Western Electric; (4) the working capital allowance, and (5) the degree to which the preceding factors will be reflected in the ultimate rate structure; so that if a bond is necessary pursuant to G. L. 1956 (1969 Reenactment) §39-5-4, court will be able to fix the amount of that bond.

Tillinghast, Collins & Graham, Andrew A. DiPrete, Louise Durfee, for petitioner. Julius C. Michaelson, Attorney General, Gregory L. Benik, Special Asst. Attorney General for respondents. Dennis J. Roberts II, for Consumers’ Council.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 359 A.2d 711, 116 R.I. 943, 1976 R.I. LEXIS 1506 (R.I. 1976).

359 A.2d 711 (New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
362 A.2d 767 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1976)