New England S. S. Co. v. New York Dock Co.
This text of 207 F. 73 (New England S. S. Co. v. New York Dock Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not see how the decree appealed from can be reversed. There are four witnesses who testified as to the alleged collision. They are flatly opposed to each other (two to two), with no theory which can harmonize their conflicting stories. The District Judge who saw them all states squarely that he believed two of them and, inferentially, that he did not believe the other two. We can find nothing in the record to convince us that he was mistaken in his judgment' of the value of their testimony.
The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
207 F. 73, 124 C.C.A. 633, 1913 U.S. App. LEXIS 1608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-england-s-s-co-v-new-york-dock-co-ca2-1913.