New England R. Co. v. Conroy

First Circuit

New England R. Co. v. Conroy

98 F. 1006, 38 C.C.A. 697, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114

CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 1900

DocketNo. 207

StatusPublished

This text of 98 F. 1006 (New England R. Co. v. Conroy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New England R. Co. v. Conroy, 98 F. 1006, 38 C.C.A. 697, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114 (1st Cir. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the questions involved in this case, and having certified to the supreme court the following questions of law arising on the facts stated in the record: First, whether the negligence of the conductor was the negligence of a fellow servant of the deceased brakeman; second, whether the negligence of the conductor was the negligence of its vice or substituted principal or representative, for which the corporation is responsible, — and the supreme court having answered the first question in the affirmative and the second question in the negative (20 Sup. Ct. 85, Adv. S. U. S. 85, 44 L. Ed. -), it follows that the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, the verdict set aside, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, the verdict set aside, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the questions involved in this case, and having certified to the supreme court the following questions of law arising on the facts stated in the record: First, whether the negligence of the conductor was the negligence of a fellow servant of the deceased brakeman; second, whether the negligence of the conductor was the negligence of its vice or substituted principal or representative, for which the corporation is responsible, — and the supreme court having answered the first question in the affirmative and the second question in the negative (20 Sup. Ct. 85, Adv. S. U. S. 85, 44 L. Ed. -), it follows that the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed, the verdict set aside, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, the verdict set aside, and the case remanded to that court for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

98 F. 1006, 38 C.C.A. 697, 1900 U.S. App. LEXIS 4114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-england-r-co-v-conroy-ca1-1900.