New England Natl. Bank v. Wallace

80 S.E. 460, 97 S.C. 52
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided April 6, 1914·No. 8783·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Gary.

AVhen the case of Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S. C. 455, 74 S. E. 977, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, was decided by this Court, it did not seem to the writer of this opinion that the plaintiff therein, was prima facie a bona fide holder of the note upon which the action was brought.

The principles then announced are practically the same as those involved in the present case. He, therefore, feels constrained to follow that case as an authority as long as it remains of force.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

New England Natl. Bank v. Wallace, 80 S.E. 460, 97 S.C. 52 (S.C. 1914).

80 S.E. 460 (New England Natl. Bank v. Wallace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merchants Nat. Bank v. Smith
96 S.E. 690 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1918)
Farmers Bank v. Crawford
88 S.E. 13 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1916)
Edens v. Gibson
84 S.E. 1005 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1915)
Commerce Trust Co. v. Grimes
82 S.E. 420 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1914)