New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. United States

385 U.S. 203
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 16, 1967
Docket591
StatusPublished

This text of 385 U.S. 203 (New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. United States, 385 U.S. 203 (1967).

Opinion

385 U.S. 203

87 S.Ct. 407

17 L.Ed.2d 300

NEW ENGLAND MOTOR RATE BUREAU, INC., et al.
v.
UNITED STATES et al.

No. 591.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 5, 1966

Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., Guy H. Postell, John W. McFadden, Harry C. Ames, Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, John S. Fessenden and Richard R. Sigmon, for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman, for the United States and others.

William Q. Keenan, for intervenor Railway Express Agency, Inc.

Arthur A. Arsham, for intervenors National Small Shipments Traffic Conference, Inc., and others.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
385 U.S. 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-england-motor-rate-bureau-inc-v-united-states-scotus-1967.