NEW DEAL TOBACCO WAREHOUSE, INC. v. Knighton
343 S.W.3d 372, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 962, 2011 WL 2791752
Opinion
ORDER
Steven Knighton appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of New Deal Tobacco after a bench trial. Knighton contends that the trial court erred in granting judgment in favor of New Deal Tobacco because New Deal Tobacco presented no substantial or competent evidence that it provided and/or that Knigh-ton received the products and services for which New Deal Tobacco sought payment. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NEW DEAL TOBACCO WAREHOUSE, INC. v. Knighton, 343 S.W.3d 372, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 962, 2011 WL 2791752 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
343 S.W.3d 372 (NEW DEAL TOBACCO WAREHOUSE, INC. v. Knighton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Slaughter v. State
343 S.W.3d 372 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)