New Castle v. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

New Castle v. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co.

51 A. 1110, 202 Pa. 425, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 537

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 5, 1902

DocketAppeal, No. 23

StatusPublished

This text of 51 A. 1110 (New Castle v. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Castle v. Central District & Printing Telegraph Co., 51 A. 1110, 202 Pa. 425, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 537 (Pa. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The facts are not specifically found, nor has a diligent examination of the.record disclosed them with sufficient certainty to afford any basis for a judgment on the merits. The case must therefore go back for fuller investigation, and in the mean time it is for the interest of all parties that the situation on the ground should remain unchanged. The decree is therefore affirmed pro forma and the case remitted for final hearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The facts are not specifically found, nor has a diligent examination of the.record disclosed them with sufficient certainty to afford any basis for a judgment on the merits. The case must therefore go back for fuller investigation, and in the mean time it is for the interest of all parties that the situation on the ground should remain unchanged. The decree is therefore affirmed pro forma and the case remitted for final hearing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 A. 1110, 202 Pa. 425, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-castle-v-central-district-printing-telegraph-co-pa-1902.