New Amsterdam Project Management Humanitarian Foundation v. Connolly

D. Nevada

New Amsterdam Project Management Humanitarian Foundation v. Connolly

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided November 25, 2020·No. 2:18-cv-01917·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 NEW AMSTERDAM PROJECT ) Case No.: 2:18-CV01917-RCJ-EJY FOUNDATION, ) 11 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER 12 ) ) 13 vs. ) ) 14 KEVIN B. CONNOLLY, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 18 The Court filed the Notice Regarding Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant 19 to Local Rule 41-1 (ECF No. 15) on October 21, 2020. Plaintiff has not complied with the Notice 20 within the allotted time. 21 “Before dismissing the action, the district court is required to weigh several factors: (1) the 22 public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; 23 24 (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on 25 their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic sanctions.” Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 26 (9th Cir. 1995) (internal citations and quotations omitted). All five factors point in favor of 27 dismissal. 28 1 Plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed for wan 2 of prosecution pursuant to Local Rule 41-1. IT THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure t

; ||comply with the Notice Regarding Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant to Loca 6 41-1 (ECF No. 15). The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 7 DATED: November 25, 2020. 9 {OBERT C.J S, District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 8 9 NEW AMSTERDAM PROJECT ) Case No.: 2:18-CV01917-RCJ-EJY FOUNDATION, ) 11 ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER 12 ) ) 13 vs. ) ) 14 KEVIN B. CONNOLLY, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16

17 18 The Court filed the Notice Regarding Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant 19 to Local Rule 41-1 (ECF No. 15) on October 21, 2020. Plaintiff has not complied with the Notice 20 within the allotted time. 21 “Before dismissing the action, the district court is required to weigh several factors: (1) the 22 public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; 23 24 (3) the risk of prejudice to the defendants; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on 25 their merits; and (5) the availability of less drastic sanctions.” Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 26 (9th Cir. 1995) (internal citations and quotations omitted). All five factors point in favor of 27 dismissal. 28 1 Plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed for wan 2 of prosecution pursuant to Local Rule 41-1. IT THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED for Plaintiff's failure t

; ||comply with the Notice Regarding Intent to Dismiss for Want of Prosecution Pursuant to Loca 6 41-1 (ECF No. 15). The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. 7 DATED: November 25, 2020. 9 {OBERT C.J S, District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

New Amsterdam Project Management Humanitarian Foundation v. Connolly, (D. Nev. 2020).

Pincite

New Amsterdam Project Management Humanitarian Foundation v. Connolly (New Amsterdam Project Management Humanitarian Foundation v. Connolly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related