New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

187 So. 2d 134, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5334

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedMarch 23, 1966

DocketNo. 10522

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 2d 134 (New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 187 So. 2d 134, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5334 (La. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

HARDY, Judge.

This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action is the workmen’s compensation insurer of the Caddo Parish Police Jury, owner of the truck driven by its employee, H. M. Gilbert, which was involved in the accident, and seeks to recover the amounts paid Gilbert in the nature of compensation benefits and medical expenses. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands it has appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128, which has this day been decided ;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARDY, Judge.

This is one of four companion suits arising from the same accident and consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal. Plaintiff in this action is the workmen’s compensation insurer of the Caddo Parish Police Jury, owner of the truck driven by its employee, H. M. Gilbert, which was involved in the accident, and seeks to recover the amounts paid Gilbert in the nature of compensation benefits and medical expenses. From judgment in favor of defendants rejecting plaintiff’s demands it has appealed.

For the reasons assigned in the opinion of this Court in the case of Peninger v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., 187 So.2d 128, which has this day been decided ;

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment appealed from be and it is affirmed at appellant’s cost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 So. 2d 134, 1966 La. App. LEXIS 5334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/new-amsterdam-casualty-co-v-hartford-accident-indemnity-co-lactapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack