New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Craighead Rice Milling Co.
334 U.S. 829, 68 S. Ct. 1340, 92 L. Ed. 1756, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2161
Opinion
C. C. A. 8th. Motion of respondent to supplement the record denied. Certiorari also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Craighead Rice Milling Co., 334 U.S. 829, 68 S. Ct. 1340, 92 L. Ed. 1756, 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2161 (1948).
334 U.S. 829 (New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Craighead Rice Milling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dicks & Gillam, Inc. v. Cleland
367 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1988)
American Surety Company of New York v. United States
317 F.2d 652 (Eighth Circuit, 1963)
Wells v. Reading Co.
138 F. Supp. 826 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1956)