Nevius v. Egbert

31 N.J. Eq. 460
CourtNew Jersey Court of Chancery
DecidedOctober 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 31 N.J. Eq. 460 (Nevius v. Egbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nevius v. Egbert, 31 N.J. Eq. 460 (N.J. Ct. App. 1879).

Opinion

The Chancellor.

Hector Toulmin, the owner of the equity of redemption of the mortgaged premises, makes application for an order setting aside the sheriff’s sale under the execution issued in this cause. The complainant bought the property at that [461]*461sale. The ground on which the application is based is surprise. There is no room to doubt that Mr. Toulmin was surprised by the sale. He supposed that he had an assurance from the sheriff that the sale would not take place on the day-on which the property wTas sold, but would be adjourned, and he appears to have had good reason to believe so. It is to be remembered, however, that the sale was of his own property under decree of foreclosure. He alleges that he was able to save the property by buying it himself at the sale, and would have done so if he had supposed that the sale was to take place on the day when the- property was .sold. He ought now, under the circumstances, to have an •opportunity to redeem it, but he is entitled to nothing more.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Penn Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n v. Joyce
183 A.2d 114 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.J. Eq. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevius-v-egbert-njch-1879.