Nevin v. Spieckermann

4 A. 497, 1 Sadler 400, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 657

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The contention here is a very narrow one. The plaintiff in error submitted one point only to the court. It consists, however, of two parts. The court substantially affirmed the point, but added a qualification to which no just exception can be tahen. The case was one for the jury, and was submitted to it in a correct charge.

Judgment affirmed.