Nevin v. Spieckermann
4 A. 497, 1 Sadler 400, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 657
This text of 4 A. 497 (Nevin v. Spieckermann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nevin v. Spieckermann, 4 A. 497, 1 Sadler 400, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 657 (Pa. 1886).
Opinion
The contention here is a very narrow one. The plaintiff in error submitted one point only to the court. It consists, however, of two parts. The court substantially affirmed the point, but added a qualification to which no just exception can be tahen. The case was one for the jury, and was submitted to it in a correct charge.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
World Pub. Co. v. Minahan
1918 OK 309 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Folwell v. Miller
145 F. 495 (Second Circuit, 1906)
Smith v. Utley
35 L.R.A. 681 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 A. 497, 1 Sadler 400, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevin-v-spieckermann-pa-1886.