Nevin Et Ux. v. Meyer-Kiser Bank

136 So. 319, 103 Fla. 1200
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 28, 1931
StatusPublished

This text of 136 So. 319 (Nevin Et Ux. v. Meyer-Kiser Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nevin Et Ux. v. Meyer-Kiser Bank, 136 So. 319, 103 Fla. 1200 (Fla. 1931).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from, a final decree in favor of complainant in a foreclosure suit. Six errors were assigned and argued and the cause was considered and affirmed by order of this Court without opinion August 6, 1930. A rehearing was granted and on second examination the Court' has reached the conclusion that the decree below should be reversed on authority of Holgate vs. Jones, 94 Fla. 198, 113 So. 714, and Homeseekers Realty Co. v. Menear, 135 So. 402. Other assignments are without merit.

It is so ordered.

Bueord, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holgate v. F. A. P. Jones
113 So. 714 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Home Seekers Realty Co. v. Menear
135 So. 402 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 So. 319, 103 Fla. 1200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevin-et-ux-v-meyer-kiser-bank-fla-1931.