Neville v. Woolverton

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Neville v. Woolverton

142 N.Y.S. 292

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 17, 1913

StatusPublished

This text of 142 N.Y.S. 292 (Neville v. Woolverton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neville v. Woolverton, 142 N.Y.S. 292 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sues for damages to some theatrical properties which he delivered to the defendant Woolverton for delivery to himself (plaintiff), care of defendant McNally, who conducted a storage warehouse. The evidence shows that a receipt was given by McNally’s bookkeeper to Woolverton’s representative for this property “in good condition,” but that it was subsequently found by plaintiff on the sidewalk in front of McNally’s premises in the damaged condition complained of.

Judgment as to defendant Woolverton reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Judgment as to defendant McNally affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff sues for damages to some theatrical properties which he delivered to the defendant Woolverton for delivery to himself (plaintiff), care of defendant McNally, who conducted a storage warehouse. The evidence shows that a receipt was given by McNally’s bookkeeper to Woolverton’s representative for this property “in good condition,” but that it was subsequently found by plaintiff on the sidewalk in front of McNally’s premises in the damaged condition complained of.

Judgment as to defendant Woolverton reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Judgment as to defendant McNally affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

142 N.Y.S. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neville-v-woolverton-nyappterm-1913.