Neville v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neville v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.

59 A.D.2d 615, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13436

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 19, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 615 (Neville v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neville v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc., 59 A.D.2d 615, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13436 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to declare that plaintiff has a vested interest in defendant’s pension plan, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 27, 1976, which, upon an agreed statement of facts, is in favor of the defendant. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that plaintiff has no vested interest in the pension plan. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice [616]*616Boyers at Trial Term (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to declare that plaintiff has a vested interest in defendant’s pension plan, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 27, 1976, which, upon an agreed statement of facts, is in favor of the defendant. Judgment modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision declaring that plaintiff has no vested interest in the pension plan. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice [616]*616Boyers at Trial Term (see Lanza v Wagner, 11 NY2d 317, 334). Hopkins, J. P., Latham, Margett and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 615, 397 N.Y.S.2d 1020, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neville-v-consolidated-edison-co-of-new-york-inc-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack