Neville v. City of Chicago

201 Ill. App. 562
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 30, 1916
DocketGen. No. 22,358
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 201 Ill. App. 562 (Neville v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neville v. City of Chicago, 201 Ill. App. 562 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Municipal corporations, § 1098*—when evidence shows negligence in care of sidewalk. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by reason of a defective plank sidewalk in defendant city, causing plaintiff to fall and a wooden sliver from the sidewalk to penetrate and tear her sexual organ, evidence examined and a verdict finding defendant guilty of negligence held sustained by the evidence. 2. Damages, § 188*—when evidence fails to show causal connection between injury and, element of damage. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by reason of a defective plank sidewalk in defendant city, causing plaintiff to fall and a wooden sliver to penetrate and tear her sexual organ, where plaintiff claimed the injuries sustained caused a diseased condition of her ovaries and necessitated the performance of an operation known as ovariotomy, evidence examined and held not to show a causal connection between the injury sustained and the diseased conditions necessitating the operation. 3. Damages, § 114*—when excessive for injury to female sexual organ. In an action to recover for personal injuries sustained by reason of a defective plank sidewalk in defendant city, causing plaintiff to fall and a sliver of wood to penetrate and tear her sexual organ, causing considerable bleeding, where the evidence failed to show a causal connection between the injuries and a diseased condition of the ovaries, necessitating an operation, a verdict for plaintiff for $15,000, remitted in the trial court to $7,500, held excessive as remitted, and a further remittitur of $6,500 ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mattice v. Klawans
228 Ill. App. 126 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 Ill. App. 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neville-v-city-of-chicago-illappct-1916.