Neverson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Neverson v. State

621 So. 2d 571, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 1993 WL 273876

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 22, 1993

DocketNo. 92-3145

StatusPublished

This text of 621 So. 2d 571 (Neverson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neverson v. State, 621 So. 2d 571, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 1993 WL 273876 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ERVIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, because his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails to satisfy the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a second motion asserting the claims described in his brief.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, J., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ERVIN, Judge.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief, because his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel fails to satisfy the test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant’s right to file a second motion asserting the claims described in his brief.

AFFIRMED.

MINER, J., and SHIVERS, Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

621 So. 2d 571, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 7633, 1993 WL 273876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neverson-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack