Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Nevels v. State

Nevels v. State

356 So. 2d 906, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nevels v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 351 So. 2d 762 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1978·No. No. FF-57·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has not demonstrated error in his conviction of aggravated battery while in the possession of a firearm. Complaint is made of a statement by the trial judge to the jury in answer to a question, appellant urging that the trial judge intimated his view of appellant’s guilt. In context, the trial judge’s statement does not have that necessary effect. It was not objected to and was not fundamental error.

AFFIRMED.

MILLS, Acting C. J., and SMITH, J., concur. MELVIN, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nevels v. State, 356 So. 2d 906, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15560 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

356 So. 2d 906 (Nevels v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Giglio v. Valdez
114 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Tanner v. State
197 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Hamilton v. State
109 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1959)
Lester v. State
37 Fla. 382 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1896)