Nevels v. Golden
This text of 92 S.E. 521 (Nevels v. Golden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where one gives notice of his intention to close a private way, but has not actually obstructed the same, the statutory remedies for removing obstructions do not apply. In a proper case injunction may issue to prevent the threatened injury. In the eases of Simmons v. Lindsay, 144 Ga. 845 (88 S. E. 199), and Adair v. Spellman Seminary, 13 Ga. App. 600 (79'S. E. 589), the obstructions actually existed at the time the injunction issued; and therefore these cases do not .conflict with the ruling here made. The evidence authorized the verdict, and none of the assignments of error require a reversal.
Judgment affirmed,.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 34, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevels-v-golden-ga-1917.