Nevels v. Golden

92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 34, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 36
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 18, 1917·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

Where one gives notice of his intention to close a private way, but has not actually obstructed the same, the statutory remedies for removing obstructions do not apply. In a proper case injunction may issue to prevent the threatened injury. In the eases of Simmons v. Lindsay, 144 Ga. 845 (88 S. E. 199), and Adair v. Spellman Seminary, 13 Ga. App. 600 (79'S. E. 589), the obstructions actually existed at the time the injunction issued; and therefore these cases do not .conflict with the ruling here made. The evidence authorized the verdict, and none of the assignments of error require a reversal.

Judgment affirmed,.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nevels v. Golden, 92 S.E. 521, 147 Ga. 34, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 36 (Ga. 1917).

92 S.E. 521 (Nevels v. Golden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hunt v. Parker
145 S.E.2d 483 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1965)
Croker v. Lewis
125 S.E.2d 50 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Hall v. Browning
24 S.E.2d 392 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Maddox v. First National Bank
11 S.E.2d 662 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Campbell v. Deal
195 S.E. 432 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Spires v. Wright
95 S.E. 232 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)