Nevarez-Ledezma v. United States
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
vs. No. 2:19-CR-01379 KG/KRS No. 2:20-CV-01144 KG/KRS
JORGE NEVAREZ-LEDEZMA,
Defendant.
ORDER SETTING EVIDENTIARY HEARING
THIS MATTER is before the Court pursuant to the scheduling conference held on October 19, 2021. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing will be held via Zoom on January 24, 2022 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will send Zoom invitations to the parties at least two weeks prior to the hearing. At the hearing, the parties may present evidence on the remaining claim in this case, which is Defendant/Movant Jorge Nevarez-Ledezma’s claim in his Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, (CV Doc. 1), that his former counsel was ineffective for failing to file an appeal. See (CV Doc. 12) (adopting Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition). The parties’ evidence should address: (1) Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma’s claim that his former counsel failed to file an appeal after Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma asked him to do so; and (2) whether the former counsel consulted with Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma about filing an appeal, or whether it was reasonable not to consult under Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470 (2000). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma, counsel for both sides, and Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma’s former counsel, shall all attend the hearing. Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma’s counsel shall coordinate with the United States Marshals Service and the prison facility to ensure Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma’s appearance at the hearing. Counsel for the United States shall ensure Mr. Nevarez-Ledezma’s former counsel’s appearance at the hearing. IT IS SO ORDERED.
KEVIN R. SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nevarez-Ledezma v. United States (Nevarez-Ledezma v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.