Nevada Property One, LLC v. Kiwibank Limited

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 31, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-01121·Unknown

Opinion

NEVADA PROPERTY 1, LLC, Case No.: 2:19-cv-01121-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Denying Without Prejudice Motions for Default Judgment and for Attorney’s v. Fees KIWIBANK LIMITED, et al., [ECF Nos. 70, 72] 7 Defendants 8 Plaintiff Nevada Property 1, LLC moves for default judgment against defendants Tek Leng Roland Kim and Chee Kong Hiew. ECF No. 70. However, the plaintiffs motion contains no analysis of the relevant factors under Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471 (9th Cir. 1986). I 11}|therefore deny the motion without prejudice to the plaintiff refiling a properly supported motion for default judgment. I also deny without prejudice the related motion for attorney’s fees. 13 I THEREFORE ORDER that plaintiff Nevada Property 1, LLC’s motion for default 14} judgment (ECF No. 70) and related motion for attorney’s fees (ECF No. 72) are DENIED without prejudice. 16 DATED this 31st day of August, 2020. 17 (INR ANDREWP.GORDON. SS 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20 21 22 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nevada Property One, LLC v. Kiwibank Limited, (D. Nev. 2020).

Nevada Property One, LLC v. Kiwibank Limited (Nevada Property One, LLC v. Kiwibank Limited) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCool
782 F.2d 1470 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)