Nevada National Bank v. Hunt

Nevada Supreme Court

Nevada National Bank v. Hunt

533 P.2d 161, 91 Nev. 181

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 1975·No. No. 7644·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

A jury returned its general verdict for the plaintiffs awarding a lump sum as damages. It is contended that the award improperly includes money for loss of profits; The court did not instruct the jury regarding loss of profits as an item Of damages. Written interrogatories were not submitted to the jury on the issue of damages. The record may be read to support the lump sum award. However, we do not deem the appeal frivolous as the respondents suggest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

A jury returned its general verdict for the plaintiffs awarding a lump sum as damages. It is contended that the award improperly includes money for loss of profits; The court did not instruct the jury regarding loss of profits as an item Of damages. Written interrogatories were not submitted to the jury on the issue of damages. The record may be read to support the lump sum award. However, we do not deem the appeal frivolous as the respondents suggest.

Affirmed.

Nevada National Bank v. Hunt, 533 P.2d 161, 91 Nev. 181 (Neb. 1975).

Pincite

533 P.2d 161 (Nevada National Bank v. Hunt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.