Nevada Deanza Family Limited Partnership v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 26, 2021·No. 5:19-cv-03773·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 NEVADA DEANZA FAMILY LIMITED Case No.19-cv-03773-NC 12 Plaintiff, Dee ONDITIONAL 13 v.

TESORO REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

16 5 17 The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that

18 || no issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this 19 || action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the 20 || Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 21 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 45 days. All scheduled dates are 22 || VACATED. 23 The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 45 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian 24 || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). 26 27 || Dated: August 26, 2021 —_~_ NATHANAEL M. COUSINS 28 United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nevada Deanza Family Limited Partnership v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Nevada Deanza Family Limited Partnership v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC (Nevada Deanza Family Limited Partnership v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Company LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)