Nevada County Narrow Gauge Railroad v. United States

Court of Claims

Nevada County Narrow Gauge Railroad v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 327, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 479, 1928 WL 2988

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 2, 1928

DocketNo. F-222

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 Ct. Cl. 327 (Nevada County Narrow Gauge Railroad v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nevada County Narrow Gauge Railroad v. United States, 65 Ct. Cl. 327, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 479, 1928 WL 2988 (cc 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Campbell, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case was heard with that of the New York Central Railroad Company, lessee, No. F-339, decided this day (ante, p. 115), and the questions in the two cases are alike. We hold in this case: (1) That this court has jurisdiction because the asserted claim is founded on a law of Congress; (2) that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, objected to by the defendant, was a valid exercise of the commission’s authority under the act of July 28, 1916, 39 Stat. 412, and (3) that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the balance due for the period in question, but interest is not allowable. The opinion in the case above mentioned is applicable to this case. Judgment is accordingly awarded.

Moss, Judge; Graham, Judge; and Booth, Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Campbell, Chief Justice,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case was heard with that of the New York Central Railroad Company, lessee, No. F-339, decided this day (ante, p. 115), and the questions in the two cases are alike. We hold in this case: (1) That this court has jurisdiction because the asserted claim is founded on a law of Congress; (2) that the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, objected to by the defendant, was a valid exercise of the commission’s authority under the act of July 28, 1916, 39 Stat. 412, and (3) that the plaintiff is entitled to judgment for the balance due for the period in question, but interest is not allowable. The opinion in the case above mentioned is applicable to this case. Judgment is accordingly awarded.

Moss, Judge; Graham, Judge; and Booth, Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Ct. Cl. 327, 1928 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 479, 1928 WL 2988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nevada-county-narrow-gauge-railroad-v-united-states-cc-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack