Neuzel v. Village of College Hill
This text of 81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571 (Neuzel v. Village of College Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[572]*572Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. An order granting a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, made in an appropriation proceeding by a municipal corporation, is not an order affecting a substantial right, for the reversal of which a petition in error can be prosecuted before the final disposition of the case. Conord v. Runnels, 23 Ohio St., 601, followed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neuzel-v-village-of-college-hill-ohio-1910.