Neuzel v. Village of College Hill

Ohio Supreme Court

Neuzel v. Village of College Hill

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 23, 1910·No. No. 11285·Published

Opinion

[572]*572Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. An order granting a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, made in an appropriation proceeding by a municipal corporation, is not an order affecting a substantial right, for the reversal of which a petition in error can be prosecuted before the final disposition of the case. Conord v. Runnels, 23 Ohio St., 601, followed.

Summers, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[572]*572Judgment affirmed. Grounds stated in journal entry.

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said circuit court be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. An order granting a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is not sustained by the evidence, made in an appropriation proceeding by a municipal corporation, is not an order affecting a substantial right, for the reversal of which a petition in error can be prosecuted before the final disposition of the case. Conord v. Runnels, 23 Ohio St., 601, followed.

Summers, C. J., Davis and Price, JJ., concur.

Neuzel v. Village of College Hill, 81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571 (Ohio 1910).

Pincite

81 Ohio St. (N.S.) 571 (Neuzel v. Village of College Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.