Neuwirth v. Melvin

273 A.D. 1026, 79 N.Y.S.2d 279
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 24, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court. The stock transfer books and papers of respondent corporations were produced at the trial of an action, and thereafter retained by appellant, an attorney. Appellant has a lien for professional services rendered to the defendant in the action, and is entitled to retain the papers of his client. But the relationship of attorney and dient does not exist between the appellant and respondent corporations. On summary applications of respondents, two orders were made directing the appellant to turn over the books and papers of respondents.

The documents were in custodia legis and appellant’s possession was as an officer of the court. It is unnecessary to consider authorities which, in disregard of that fact, are not controlling and are irrelevant and academic.

Orders affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neuwirth v. Melvin, 273 A.D. 1026, 79 N.Y.S.2d 279 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

273 A.D. 1026 (Neuwirth v. Melvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related