Neustadt v. New York City Railway Co.
104 N.Y.S. 735
Opinion
Our attention has not been called to any authority for the ruling of the court permitting the unsworn testimony of the [736]*736witness Weinrib, a child 7J4 years of age, to be given; and the denial of the defendant’s motion to strike it out, which was duly excepted to, was error.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Neustadt v. New York City Railway Co., 104 N.Y.S. 735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
104 N.Y.S. 735 (Neustadt v. New York City Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ranofsky v. Frank
208 A.D. 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1924)
Michel v. Semer
205 A.D. 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1923)
Stoppick v. Goldstein
174 A.D. 306 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1916)
Gehl v. Bachmann-Bechtel Brewing Co.
156 A.D. 51 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)