Neustadt v. Joyce
This text of 345 Mass. 765 (Neustadt v. Joyce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order dismissing report affirmed. On conflicting evidence the judge found that the negligence of the defendant was the sole cause of the collision with the plaintiff’s vehicle. He made special findings of fact which supported the general finding for the plaintiff. Of the four requests of the defendant which were not granted, two were correctly ruled inapplicable in view of the facts found by the judge, and two in effect were requests for findings of fact which the judge was not required to make. The Appellate Division properly dismissed the report. No question of law is presented. Holton v. Denaro, 278 Mass. 261, 262-263. Kelsey v. Hampton Court Hotel Co. 327 Mass. 150, 152.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
345 Mass. 765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neustadt-v-joyce-mass-1962.