Neun v. Van Deusen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neun v. Van Deusen

167 A.D. 952, 151 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 167 A.D. 952 (Neun v. Van Deusen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neun v. Van Deusen, 167 A.D. 952, 151 N.Y.S. 1132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that there is no sufficient evidence to support the fifth, sixth, and seventh findings of fact to the effect that at the time the agreement was entered into between defendant and S. C. Wells & Co., for the sale to said company of all the shares of stock of the B. H. Bacon Company, it was the purpose or understanding of the parties that the business of the B. H. Bacon Company was not to be continued, or that its assets and business were to be taken over and absorbed by S. C. Wells & Co. Also that such a finding is necessary to support the conclusion of law. All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that there is no sufficient evidence to support the fifth, sixth, and seventh findings of fact to the effect that at the time the agreement was entered into between defendant and S. C. Wells & Co., for the sale to said company of all the shares of stock of the B. H. Bacon Company, it was the purpose or understanding of the parties that the business of the B. H. Bacon Company was not to be continued, or that its assets and business were to be taken over and absorbed by S. C. Wells & Co. Also that such a finding is necessary to support the conclusion of law. All concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

167 A.D. 952, 151 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neun-v-van-deusen-nyappdiv-1915.