Neuman v. Uris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neuman v. Uris

244 A.D. 285, 279 N.Y.S. 325, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5810

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1935

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 A.D. 285 (Neuman v. Uris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neuman v. Uris, 244 A.D. 285, 279 N.Y.S. 325, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5810 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The jury’s finding that the plaintiff’s proposed customer was “ able ” was against the credible evidence. As bearing upon this issue the defendants were entitled to show that the proposed purchaser had unsatisfied judgments against him and it was error for the court to instruct the jury in substance that this fact was immaterial. The defendants were also entitled to show the exact amount of cash, if any, which the customer had on deposit. We do not treat of other alleged erroneous ruhngs as they will not in all probability arise upon the new trial.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment and orders should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The jury’s finding that the plaintiff’s proposed customer was “ able ” was against the credible evidence. As bearing upon this issue the defendants were entitled to show that the proposed purchaser had unsatisfied judgments against him and it was error for the court to instruct the jury in substance that this fact was immaterial. The defendants were also entitled to show the exact amount of cash, if any, which the customer had on deposit. We do not treat of other alleged erroneous ruhngs as they will not in all probability arise upon the new trial.

It follows, therefore, that the judgment and orders should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Judgment and orders reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 A.D. 285, 279 N.Y.S. 325, 1935 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5810, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neuman-v-uris-nyappdiv-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack