Neuman v. Levy

245 A.D. 733
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Order striking out the affirmative defense of the Statute of Limitations contained in paragraphs fifth to ninth, inclusive, of the defendant’s answer in a negligence action brought by the administrator to recover damages resulting from the death of plaintiff’s intestate through the alleged negligence of the defendant affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of opinion that the limitation of time contained in the Decedent Estate Law (§ 130) within which an action may be brought by an executor or administrator for negligence causing death of the decedent is not a defense to an action brought within two years after the death of the person injured as the result of an accident where an action, duly brought, was pending at the time of her death, notwithstanding the expiration of the three-year period prescribed by the Civil Practice Act (§ 49) within which an action to recover damages for a personal injury resulting from negligence must be brought. (Haas v. N. Y. Post Graduate Medical School & Hospital, 131 Misc. 395.) (See, also, Littlewood v. Mayor, e c., of New York, 89 N. Y. 24, and Murray v. Usher, 117 id. 542, at p. 548.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Neuman v. Levy, 245 A.D. 733 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

245 A.D. 733 (Neuman v. Levy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Varveris v. United States Lines Co.
141 F. Supp. 874 (S.D. New York, 1956)
Pieczonka v. Pullman Co.
89 F.2d 353 (Second Circuit, 1937)
Johnson v. Stromberg-Carlson Telephone Manufacturing Co.
250 A.D. 352 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)