Neuman v. Dunham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Neuman v. Dunham

49 A.D.2d 719, 374 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 23, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 719 (Neuman v. Dunham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Neuman v. Dunham, 49 A.D.2d 719, 374 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered December 17, 1974, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint by reason of the defense of the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements [720]*720of this appeal. CPLR 202 provides that for a New York resident the New York Statute of Limitations shall apply for an action accruing outside the State. CPLR 214 provides for a three-year Statute of Limitations. The accident occurred in Pennsylvania, and the action was commenced in Bronx County after the two-year Pennsylvania Statute of Limitations had run. In view of the important question of law involved, leave is granted to the defendant-appellant to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered December 17, 1974, denying defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint by reason of the defense of the Statute of Limitations, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements [720]*720of this appeal. CPLR 202 provides that for a New York resident the New York Statute of Limitations shall apply for an action accruing outside the State. CPLR 214 provides for a three-year Statute of Limitations. The accident occurred in Pennsylvania, and the action was commenced in Bronx County after the two-year Pennsylvania Statute of Limitations had run. In view of the important question of law involved, leave is granted to the defendant-appellant to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Concur—Markewich, J. P., Kupferman, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 719, 374 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neuman-v-dunham-nyappdiv-1975.