Neuls v. City of Scranton

61 A. 77, 211 Pa. 581, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 506
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 24, 1905
DocketAppeal, No. 277
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A. 77 (Neuls v. City of Scranton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neuls v. City of Scranton, 61 A. 77, 211 Pa. 581, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 506 (Pa. 1905).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The constitutionality of the Act of March 7, 1901, P. L. 20 was expressty affirmed in Com. v. Moir, 199 Pa. 534. Every question advanced now, including the constitutional power of [582]*582the legislature to remove, or to authorize directly or indirectly the removal of an elected municipal officer, was there considered and determined adversely to appellant’s present contention.

In Neuls v. City of Scranton, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 286, it was shown that the act of 1901 authorized the recorder to remove an assessor previously elected. It is unnecessary to add anything further on the subject.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spayd v. Ringing Rock Lodge
113 A. 70 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A. 77, 211 Pa. 581, 1905 Pa. LEXIS 506, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neuls-v-city-of-scranton-pa-1905.