Neuhaus v. Decholnoky
859 A.2d 563, 271 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 421
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 8, 2004
DocketSC 17249
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 859 A.2d 563 (Neuhaus v. Decholnoky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Neuhaus v. Decholnoky, 859 A.2d 563, 271 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 421 (Colo. 2004).
Opinion
The petition by the defendant Stamford Hospital for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 83 Conn. App. 576 (AC 23317), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, as to the defendant Stamford Hospital, there were sufficient facts in dispute to warrant invocation of the continuing course of conduct doctrine?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Neuhaus v. DeCholnoky
905 A.2d 1135 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
859 A.2d 563, 271 Conn. 903, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neuhaus-v-decholnoky-conn-2004.