Neubert v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.

237 S.W. 629, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 223
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 15, 1922
DocketNo. 1912.
StatusPublished

This text of 237 S.W. 629 (Neubert v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neubert v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co., 237 S.W. 629, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 223 (Tex. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

HUFF, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a general exception to plaintiff’s original petition. The order does not show upon sustaining the exception that the plaintiff declined to further amend, and that judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the defendant against the plaintiff, or that plaintiff’s cause of action be dismissed. The order as entered is only interlocutory, and does not dispose of the case, and is not a final judgment from which an appeal can be prosecuted. This court is therefore without jurisdiction. Hill v. Nolan, 147 S. W. 365; Darby v. White, 165 S. W. 481.

The appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Darby v. White
165 S.W. 481 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1914)
Hill v. Nolan
147 S.W. 365 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 S.W. 629, 1922 Tex. App. LEXIS 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neubert-v-chicago-r-i-g-ry-co-texapp-1922.