Neubauer v. Soper

463 So. 2d 328, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11804
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1985
DocketNo. 84-892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 328 (Neubauer v. Soper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neubauer v. Soper, 463 So. 2d 328, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11804 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a petition for writ of common law certiorari addressed to the trial court orders which denied defendants’ motions which sought to disqualify trial counsel from serving as counsel of record in this cause for respondents. Our review reveals that said lawyer and law firm have substantial conflicts of interest which necessitate their recusal from this case. Chesler v. Hendler, 428 So.2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); The Florida Bar v. Moore, 194 So.2d 264 (Fla.1966); Florida Code of Professional Responsibility, EC5-14 and DR5-105 (1984).

We accept jurisdiction and grant certiora-ri. The orders in question are quashed and the cause remanded with instructions to enter an order granting defendants’ motion to disqualify attorneys.

GRANTED.

DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, C.J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clark v. Dept. of Professional Regulation
463 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 So. 2d 328, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 129, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 11804, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neubauer-v-soper-fladistctapp-1985.