Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.
This text of 9 A.D.2d 961 (Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from so much of a resettled order as denied a motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint on appellant, a foreign corporation, on the ground that it was not “ doing business ” here. Resettled order modified by striking therefrom everything beginning with the word “ denied ” in the second ordering paragraph and ending with the words “ the Official Referee ” and by substituting therefor the word “ granted ”. As so modified, resettled order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant was not “ doing business ” in this State (Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N Y 2d 475; Pennrich & Go. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, 247 N. Y. 592; Hamlin v. Barrett & Go., 246 N. Y. 554). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 234.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 961, 195 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neu-v-teen-time-inc-nyappdiv-1959.