Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.

9 A.D.2d 961, 195 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5283

This text of 9 A.D.2d 961 (Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Neu v. Teen Time, Inc., 9 A.D.2d 961, 195 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Opinion

Appeal from so much of a resettled order as denied a motion to vacate the service of the summons and complaint on appellant, a foreign corporation, on the ground that it was not “ doing business ” here. Resettled order modified by striking therefrom everything beginning with the word “ denied ” in the second ordering paragraph and ending with the words the Official Referee and by substituting therefor the word granted ”. As so modified, resettled order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, appellant was not “ doing business ” in this State (Miller v. Surf Props., 4 N Y 2d 475; Pennrich & Go. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, 247 N. Y. 592; Hamlin v. Barrett & Go., 246 N. Y. 554). Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [18 Misc 2d 234.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pennrich & Co. v. Juniata Hosiery Mills, Inc.
161 N.E. 195 (New York Court of Appeals, 1928)
Hamlin v. G. E. Barrett & Co.
159 N.E. 648 (New York Court of Appeals, 1927)
Neu v. Teen Time, Inc.
18 Misc. 2d 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 A.D.2d 961, 195 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/neu-v-teen-time-inc-nyappdiv-1959.